Independent educational reading about belief, conscience and coexistence
Religious Tolerance
Christianity, race and institutional change

Racism in the LDS Church: a partial success story.

A historical overview of racial ideas, policy and change within the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, written for careful comparison rather than condemnation or defense.

Open historical book beside a church window
Historical orientation

Two major conflicts with government policy

The church's history includes more than one period in which religious practice, public policy and institutional authority came into tension.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints developed in a period of intense American religious and political conflict. Its relationship with the federal government was shaped first by disputes over plural marriage and later by scrutiny of racial restrictions.

Plural marriage and Utah statehood

During the nineteenth century, federal opposition to the church's practice of plural marriage contributed to repeated delays in Utah's path to statehood. Church leaders ended the practice institutionally in 1890, and Utah achieved statehood in 1896.

Racial restrictions and public pressure

In the twentieth century, the church faced growing criticism of restrictions affecting members of African ancestry. Questions about tax treatment, athletics and public participation added pressure for institutional review. In 1978, church leadership announced a change that opened priesthood ordination and temple participation to Black members.

Reading noteThis page uses historical language and does not treat a single announcement as the end of every racial issue. Beliefs, institutional rules, lived experience and later interpretation are distinct parts of the record.

What this page does—and does not—claim

The phrase “partial success story” signals both change and incompleteness. The historical record includes harmful teachings and exclusionary practices, as well as later efforts to revise policy and public understanding. Readers should distinguish official statements, historical evidence and the varied experiences of members.

Questions for readers

How to approach a difficult history

Historical topics become clearer when institutional change is considered alongside the people affected by it.

Why describe the story as only partial?

Because policy change can be significant without erasing earlier teachings, institutional harm or continuing questions about representation and belonging.

What changed in 1978?

Church leadership announced that Black men could receive priesthood ordination and that Black members could participate in temple ordinances previously restricted to them.

Does the 1978 change explain every earlier teaching?

No. It marked an important institutional change, but it does not by itself resolve the historical meaning or consequences of earlier racial explanations and practices.

Why include the earlier dispute over plural marriage?

The comparison shows how the church has previously navigated conflict between internal religious authority, public institutions and federal policy. The two disputes concern different subjects and should not be treated as identical.

Where can I read related material?

Use the section links above, or browse the wider Christianity collection and the site's material on human rights.

Editorial context

Careful comparison matters

Religious Tolerance presents this subject as an educational history. It does not speak for LDS members, Black communities or any other group. Readers are encouraged to consult primary documents, current institutional statements and scholarship alongside this summary.

For questions about the collection or to report an error, contact info@religioustolerance.en-html.org.