Independent educational reading about belief, conscience and coexistence
Religious Tolerance
Wicca · Ethics and practice

The Wiccan Rede

An educational examination of the Rede as a guide to moral choice: its meaning, documented history, possible literary influences and the practical questions raised by a commitment to avoid harm.

Sunlight passing through a quiet forest

What the Rede means

The best-known short form of the Wiccan Rede advises people to follow their will provided that no harm results. “Rede” means counsel or advice, so many Wiccans understand the statement as a demanding ethical guideline rather than a rule enforced by an external authority.

Personal judgment

The individual weighs motives, likely outcomes and responsibility.

Avoiding harm

The principle directs attention to effects on oneself, other people and, for some, the wider living world.

No simple checklist

Hard cases may require choosing the option likely to produce the least harm.

How Wiccan writers interpret it

Wiccan commentators have often emphasized that the Rede does not remove the need for moral reasoning. Judy Harrow described Craft ethics as an adult responsibility carried out with incomplete knowledge: people must decide, act and accept the consequences, including the possibility of error.

Robin Woodsong similarly presented the avoidance of harm as more difficult than following an exhaustive code. In this view, freedom brings difficult choices rather than freedom from accountability.

Other explanations describe the Rede alongside the Threefold Law as a foundation for ethical conduct within Wiccan communities. Interpretations vary: some treat it as Wicca's closest equivalent to a law, while others prefer “guideline” because it describes a standard of conduct without implying punishment by a central institution.

Important distinction

The phrase is not generally read as permission to do anything one wants. Ethical liberty remains conditioned by attention to foreseeable harm, responsibility and the rights of others.

A brief documented history

Research into early modern Wiccan writing links the developing Rede to works associated with Gerald Gardner and Doreen Valiente. Because modern Wicca has multiple traditions and no single governing authority, accounts of the Rede's development are not completely uniform.

1950sGardner's The Meaning of Witchcraft described a principle of acting freely while avoiding harm and minimizing any unavoidable injury.
3 October 1964A report of a public address by Valiente recorded the familiar eight-word form at a dinner connected with the publication Pentagram.
Later useThe concise wording circulated widely and became one of the most recognizable summaries of Wiccan ethics, although its interpretation still differs among practitioners.

Possible earlier influences

Several older expressions have been proposed as intellectual or literary precedents. Similarity does not by itself prove a direct line of transmission, so these connections are best treated as possible influences.

Augustine of Hippo

In a homily on the First Epistle of John, Augustine used a Latin expression commonly translated as an instruction to love and then act according to one's will. His argument placed rightly ordered love at the center of moral action.

François Rabelais

In Gargantua (1534), Rabelais imagined an abbey whose members acted according to their will. The passage assumes that free, cultivated people are drawn toward honorable conduct rather than vice.

Thelema

Aleister Crowley's early twentieth-century Book of the Law made the pursuit of one's will central to the Law of Thelema, while also joining will with love. Thelemite interpretations commonly distinguish an individual's deeper purpose, or True Will, from passing impulse.

Because Gardner had contact with Crowley's ceremonial tradition, some historians consider Thelemic language a plausible influence on the Rede. Another theory connects the wording with a longer Wiccan Credo attributed in some traditions to Adriana Porter. The surviving evidence does not establish a single ancient source.

Applying the Rede

The central difficulty is that actions often have mixed or uncertain consequences. Ethical deliberation therefore involves more than asking whether an action causes any harm at all.

  • Competing harms: Every available option may carry a cost. Some practitioners respond by choosing the course expected to cause the least serious harm, including the harm caused by doing nothing.
  • Protection and self-defense: Preventing aggression can require restraint or intervention. The ethical question becomes whether the response is necessary, proportionate and directed toward preventing greater injury.
  • The scope of “none”: Interpretations differ over whether the term includes only people or extends to animals, ecosystems and plants. This affects choices involving food, consumption and environmental responsibility.
  • Uncertain personhood: Disagreement over when personhood begins makes reproductive ethics especially complex. Readers can review the archive's overview of views about the beginning of personhood.
  • Indirect effects: Transport, energy use and ordinary purchases may contribute to pollution or climate change. A literal standard of zero harm is therefore difficult to satisfy.
  • Foreseeability: A practical reading asks what consequences a person could reasonably predict, what alternatives were available and how unintended harm should be addressed.

Reading the principle carefully

The Rede is advisory rather than a complete decision procedure. It does not settle every conflict by itself; it asks practitioners to examine freedom, intent, consequences and accountability together.

Sources and further context

The original Essay drew on the following works. Some cited web resources may no longer be active, so the descriptions below preserve bibliographic context without guaranteeing availability.

  1. Judy Harrow, Exegesis on the Wiccan Rede, Harvest, volume 5, number 3.
  2. Robin Woodsong, A View on the Wiccan Rede, formerly published by Real Magick.
  3. Wren, The Wiccan Rede, Witchvox, 16 July 2000.
  4. Erin Dragonsong, The Wiccan Rede, Wicca Spirituality.
  5. Gerald Gardner, The Meaning of Witchcraft, reprinted 1982, p. 127.
  6. John Coughlin, The Wiccan Rede: A Historical Journey, parts 2 and 3, Waning Moon, 2001–2002.
  7. François Rabelais, Gargantua, 1534.
  8. Aleister Crowley, The Book of the Law, chapter 1.
  9. Ellie Crystal, Aleister Crowley, Crystalinks.

Continue with the Wiccan Rede overview

Read the preceding Essay for additional background and terminology.

Previous essay
Reader guide

Questions about the Rede

Concise answers to common questions raised by this ethical principle.

Is the Wiccan Rede a commandment?

Many Wiccans describe it as counsel or an ethical guideline rather than a universally enforced law. Wiccan traditions differ, and there is no central authority that determines one binding interpretation.

Does it mean a person may do whatever they want?

No. The individual's will is expressly considered in relation to harm. The Rede connects freedom with careful judgment and responsibility for consequences.

What happens when every option causes harm?

A common approach is to minimize harm by considering severity, likelihood, affected parties and the consequences of taking no action.

Does “none” include animals and the environment?

There is no universal answer. Some readings focus primarily on people, while others extend moral consideration to animals, ecosystems and other living things.

Is the Rede ancient?

The familiar short wording is documented in modern Wiccan history. Older texts contain related ideas about love, will and conduct, but similarity alone does not establish that the Rede directly descended from them.

Do all Wiccans use the Rede in the same way?

No. Its importance and interpretation vary among traditions and individuals. Some regard it as foundational, while others use additional ethical teachings or different frameworks.