Independent educational reading about belief, conscience and coexistence
Religious Tolerance
Definitions and religious literacy

What does “Satanism” mean?

The word has been applied to several distinct religious and non-religious positions. This guide separates self-identified traditions from broad polemical labels that can obscure rather than explain.

EssayReviewed 19 June 20268-minute read
Open reference book and magnifying glass on a desk

Why the definition matters

People often have a general idea of what names such as Christianity, Islam or Judaism refer to, even when their understanding is incomplete. “Satanism” is less straightforward. It can identify a small number of self-described religious movements, but it has also been used as a hostile catch-all for unrelated religions, spiritual practices and cultural interests.

Those uses should not be treated as interchangeable. A useful description identifies who is applying the term, what beliefs or practices are involved, and whether the people being described use the label for themselves.

Self-identified Satanic traditions

Non-theistic or symbolic Satanism

Some organized Satanists use Satan as a symbol of individualism, skepticism, autonomy or resistance to authority rather than as a supernatural being. Many identify as atheists or agnostics. The Church of Satan is a prominent historical example associated with this approach.

An archived interview with one of that organization’s leaders characterized its philosophy as emphasizing individual responsibility, self-interest and skepticism, with influences from modern philosophy and Western occult traditions. The interview also explained that adherents do not worship or believe in the Christian Devil. This summary is a paraphrase of the source rather than a direct quotation.

Theistic Satanism

Theistic or spiritual Satanists understand Satan as an actual spiritual being or deity. Views vary among individuals and small groups, so the label alone does not establish a shared theology, organization or practice.

This position is distinct from symbolic Satanism and from the Christian concept of Satan. It is also distinct from unrelated religions that outsiders sometimes place under the same label.

Reliable membership figures are difficult to establish. Organizations may not publish totals, self-identification changes over time, and broad surveys do not always distinguish symbolic from theistic approaches. For those reasons, this page does not repeat unsupported population estimates from older material.

Polemical and outsider definitions

Some Christians have used “Satanism” much more broadly than self-identified Satanists do. These definitions arise from particular theological frameworks, but they should not be mistaken for neutral descriptions of other communities.

All religions outside one Christian tradition

A strict dualistic view may classify anyone who does not share a particular form of Christianity as aligned with Satan. Applied consistently, this would include most Christians as well as followers of every other religion and people with no religion. The category becomes so broad that it provides little useful information.

All non-Christian religions

A somewhat narrower usage assigns the label to every non-Christian religion. This conflates independent traditions such as Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam and Judaism, each of which has its own history and teachings.

Religions outside the Abrahamic family

Another usage excludes Judaism, Christianity and Islam but applies the term to religions beyond those three. This remains an outsider classification and does not describe how the affected communities understand themselves.

Selected minority religions and practices

Some writers have labeled traditions such as Santería, Vodun, Druidry, Wicca and other Neopagan religions as Satanic. The same label has sometimes been extended to the occult, astrology or fraternal organizations. These subjects are not one religion and should be studied on their own terms.

Calling unrelated communities Satanists creates confusion and can reinforce religious hostility. Many of the traditions named above do not teach the existence of Satan at all, while others understand evil, spirits and moral responsibility through very different frameworks.

A clearer way to use the term

For educational writing, “Satanism” is most precise when limited to people or organizations that self-identify with a Satanic religious or philosophical tradition. A qualifier should then clarify the relevant position.

Theistic Satanist

A person who understands Satan as a real spiritual being and incorporates that being into personal or communal religious practice.

Non-theistic Satanist

A person who uses Satan symbolically within a non-theistic philosophy or religion and does not worship a supernatural Devil.

When discussing a specific organization, its actual name and stated beliefs are more informative than a broad label. When reporting an accusation made by an outsider, identify it as an accusation rather than presenting it as a settled description.

Source and archive note

This essay updates an older archive entry. Attributed interview material and religious texts have been paraphrased in calm, factual language. Links below provide nearby background within the collection.

Reading contested labels

A practical method

Three checks help distinguish a useful religious description from rhetoric imposed by an outsider.

Identify the speaker

Note whether the label comes from adherents, researchers, journalists, critics or theological opponents.

Check self-description

Compare the label with the community’s own name, beliefs and account of its practices.

Add a qualifier

Use precise terms such as theistic, non-theistic, symbolic or alleged whenever the distinction matters.

Reader guide

Frequently asked questions

Do all Satanists believe in a supernatural Satan?

No. Some are theistic, while many organized Satanists use Satan as a symbol and identify with non-theistic positions.

Is Satanism a form of Christianity?

Self-identified Satanic traditions are generally treated as distinct. Some engage critically with Christian imagery, but that does not make them Christian denominations.

Are Wicca, Vodun or Santería forms of Satanism?

No. They are separate traditions with their own histories and beliefs. Applying “Satanism” to them is an outsider classification that their adherents reject.

Why not provide a population estimate?

Available figures are uncertain because definitions vary, many groups do not publish membership, and surveys may combine unlike positions.

What is the most neutral wording?

Name the specific movement where possible. Otherwise use a qualified term such as “theistic Satanism” or “non-theistic Satanism” and explain what it means.

Where can I find more definitions?

Visit the glossary or the collection of religious terms with multiple meanings.