Independent educational reading about belief, conscience and coexistence
Religious Tolerance
Religious practices · Archive guide

How often do people attend religious services worldwide?

Historical survey results show striking differences among countries. They also demonstrate why reported attendance should be read as a dated estimate—not a current census of religious life.

Historical data: 1990–1998Reviewed 4 September 2026Reading time: 8 minutes
Rows of chairs arranged in a quiet community gathering space

What this archive contains

  • Self-reported weekly attendance from an international survey conducted mainly in 1995–1997.
  • Several entries based on an earlier 1990–1991 survey round.
  • Context about differences between reported behavior and independently estimated attendance.

Understanding the historical survey

The World Values Survey interviewed adult samples across many societies. The archived figures below record the percentage of respondents who said they attended religious services at least weekly. Although the source framed much of the discussion as church attendance, the broader subject is participation in religious services.

The study reported that the United States had unusually high stated attendance among countries at a comparable level of economic development. In the same survey period, 53% of respondents in the United States described religion as very important in their lives, compared with 16% in Britain, 14% in France and 13% in Germany.

Researchers also observed a broad decline in attendance across many industrialized societies while interest in spiritual meaning did not necessarily decline at the same pace. In societies facing economic or political uncertainty, religion often retained greater reported importance.

Archive and accuracy note

These figures are more than a quarter-century old and should not be presented as current rates. Survey wording, sampling, social expectations and the meaning of “attendance” vary across cultures. Later research may use different methods and produce different estimates.

Reported weekly attendance

The original list has been retained as historical data and sorted from the highest reported percentage to the lowest. Asterisks mark figures drawn from the 1990–1991 survey round. Historical geographic labels are identified where helpful.

Adults reporting attendance at religious services at least once a week
Country or territoryReported attendance
Nigeria89%
Ireland84%*
Philippines68%
Northern Ireland58%
South Africa56%
Poland55%
Puerto Rico52%
Portugal47%*
Slovakia47%
Mexico46%
Italy45%*
Dominican Republic44%
Belgium44%
United States44%
Turkey43%
Peru43%
India42%
Canada38%*
Brazil36%
Netherlands35%
Venezuela31%
Uruguay31%
Austria30%*
Britain27%*
Chile25%
Argentina25%
Spain25%
Slovenia22%
Croatia22%
Hungary21%*
France21%*
Romania20%*
Switzerland16%
Australia16%
Lithuania16%
South Korea14%
West Germany (historical label)14%
Czech Republic14%*
Taiwan11%
Bulgaria10%*
Ukraine10%
Moldova10%
Georgia10%
China9%
Armenia8%
Serbia7%
Montenegro7%
Azerbaijan6%
Belarus6%
Latvia5%
Denmark5%*
Norway5%
East Germany (historical region)5%
Sweden4%
Iceland4%
Finland4%
Estonia4%
Japan3%
Russia2%

* Based on 1990–1991 survey data.

Why self-reports need caution

Research comparing survey answers with other attendance measures suggested that people in the United States and Canada sometimes reported more frequent participation than observational estimates indicated. The archived analysis cited approximate weekly rates of 20% in the United States and 10% in Canada under those alternative methods. Those estimates are themselves historical and method-dependent.

The same degree of over-reporting cannot simply be assumed in every country. Cultural expectations, religious calendars, congregation records and the definition of a service all affect comparison. A survey percentage is best understood as a response to a particular question in a particular time and place.

Patterns reported in 1998

A subsequent study covering almost 166,000 respondents found declining attendance in 15 of 19 industrialized democracies. Northern Ireland and Great Britain showed small increases. The study also reported increased attendance in five of eight formerly communist societies. These findings describe the survey period and do not establish present-day trends.

Sources recorded with the original essay

  1. A University of Michigan news release summarizing worldwide religiosity and attendance research, published in December 1997.
  2. A January 2000 journal report discussing the study's findings about spiritual questions and institutional attendance.

The original external hyperlinks are no longer included because their continued availability and integrity cannot be guaranteed. Readers using these data in research should locate the relevant World Values Survey documentation and cite the exact survey wave.

Research literacy

How to use historical survey data

Check the date

Treat the figures as a record of the 1990s, not a description of 2026.

Read the question

Weekly service attendance is narrower than religious belief or identity.

Compare methods

Self-reports, time-use studies and congregation counts can yield different results.

Respect context

Religious customs and social expectations differ substantially among countries.

Reader guide

Frequently asked questions

Are these current attendance rates?

No. Most figures come from 1995–1997, while starred entries come from 1990–1991.

Does attendance measure how religious a country is?

Not by itself. Religion may be expressed through private practice, festivals, identity, ethics or community life beyond weekly services.

Why might respondents overstate attendance?

Memory, social expectations and different interpretations of frequency can influence answers. The effect may vary between cultures.

Can countries be ranked directly from this table?

Only with substantial caution. Survey years, wording, sampling and local meanings are not necessarily identical.

Why are West and East Germany listed separately?

The source preserved historical regional categories used in the relevant survey material. They are not current sovereign-country labels.

Where can I report a correction?

Use the contact page or email info@religioustolerance.en-html.org with the page title and supporting source.