Independent educational reading about belief, conscience and coexistence
Religious Tolerance
Islam, ethics & public life

Muslim statements against terrorism

A contextual guide to public condemnations of terrorist attacks and violence against civilians from Muslim organizations, scholars and community voices.

Archive overview

Condemnations from Muslim sources

Public discussion has sometimes suggested that Muslim religious authorities rarely condemn terrorism. The historical record is more varied: organizations and individuals in many Muslim communities have rejected attacks on civilians and emphasized that such violence conflicts with Islamic principles.

This section gathers examples of those statements and places them in context. It is not intended to speak for every Muslim community, nor to reduce complex debates about religion, politics and violence to a single explanation.

Many of the statements were issued in response to particular attacks or public controversies. Their wording, institutional authority and intended audience differ, so readers should treat each item as a dated contribution to a wider discussion rather than as a universal declaration.

Reading note

The material is an educational website. It distinguishes between the actions of violent groups and the beliefs of the much larger populations whose religious identity those groups may claim. Historical references should be read with attention to their original date and circumstances.

How to use this archive

Begin with the overview, then compare statements by date, source and purpose. When evaluating a claim, ask whether it represents an institution, a scholar, a civic group or an individual, and whether it addresses terrorism generally or a particular event.

Reader guide

Frequently asked questions

Does this page claim that all Muslims hold one view?

No. Muslim communities and authorities are diverse. This page presents selected public statements and does not treat them as a complete representation of Muslim belief.

Why include older statements?

The page is an archive of public responses to historical events. Earlier material remains useful for understanding how organizations framed questions of terrorism and civilian protection at the time.

Are the linked pages part of the same topic?

Yes. The linked essays continue the archive by grouping statements by organization, location or historical context.

How should quotations and translations be assessed?

Readers should consider the source, date, translation and surrounding context. A short excerpt may not represent the full argument of an organization or author.

How can I report a factual correction?

Use the contact page or email info@religioustolerance.en-html.org with the page title and a concise description of the correction.