Independent educational reading about belief, conscience and coexistence
Religious Tolerance
Human rights & cultural context

Female genital mutilation/cutting

An educational overview of FGM/C, its health and human-rights implications, its relationship to culture and religion, and the historical material held in this archive.

Archive overviewReviewed 18 August 2026Sensitive subject
Women walking together through a sunlit landscape

Terminology and scope

Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is an umbrella term for procedures involving injury to or alteration of external female genital tissue for non-medical reasons. “FGM,” “FGM/C” and “female genital cutting” are all used in public-health, community and human-rights discussions. Language choices vary because writers may need to describe the harm clearly while communicating respectfully with affected communities.

The procedures differ in extent. They are commonly carried out on girls, can cause severe pain and may lead to immediate or lasting physical and psychological complications. The consequences can include infection, problems with urination or menstruation, chronic pain, complications during pregnancy and childbirth, and trauma.

Culture, religion and community

FGM/C predates several modern religious traditions and is not required by the central teachings of any one religion. It has occurred among communities with different religious identities, as well as in communities where customary or social expectations are more influential than formal doctrine. It is therefore inaccurate to treat the practice as belonging to all followers of Islam, Christianity, Judaism or any other single faith.

Prevalence can differ considerably between neighboring countries and between communities within the same country. Migration has also made safeguarding and survivor care relevant in North America and Europe. Effective prevention generally combines law, education, healthcare, survivor-led support and sustained local engagement rather than stereotyping an entire religion or nationality.

Human rights and public policy

United Nations bodies regard FGM/C as a violation of the rights of women and girls. A 2012 United Nations General Assembly resolution called on states to prohibit the practice, protect those at risk, and support coordinated prevention. This was a global policy commitment rather than a self-executing worldwide criminal law; national legislation and enforcement remain important.

Legal approaches have changed over time in countries where the practice has occurred. The website pages below preserve dated reports about Egypt, Indonesia, African countries, the United Kingdom, North America and Europe. Readers should treat older descriptions of laws or prevalence as historical snapshots, not current legal guidance.

A related but distinct issue

Older material on this site placed FGM/C beside medically unnecessary genital surgery on intersex infants. These are distinct issues with different contexts. Intersex people are born with sex characteristics that do not fit typical definitions of female or male bodies. Advocates and medical-ethics bodies have challenged irreversible, non-urgent procedures performed before a child can participate in the decision.

For the archived discussion, see intersex-related surgery in North America and Europe and the site's overview of intersex experiences.

Source trail

Selected historical references

  1. United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/67/146, adopted in 2012, on intensifying global efforts to eliminate female genital mutilation.
  2. African Women's Organisation, Training Kit: Prevention and Elimination of Female Genital Mutilation among Immigrants in Europe, 2005.
  3. Integrated Regional Information Networks, archived 2010 reporting on the persistence of FGM/C in Indonesia following government restrictions.
  4. Toronto Star reporting from 2017 concerning accounts of FGM/C in Canada.
  5. Hindustan Times background reporting on the practice in India.

These references support the historical archive but do not substitute for current clinical guidance, safeguarding advice or legal information.

Reader guide

Frequently asked questions

Is FGM/C required by a particular religion?

No. It is a cultural practice found in some communities with differing religious identities, and it is absent from many communities sharing those same religions.

Why does the page use “FGM/C”?

The combined term identifies the serious harm while acknowledging that community educators and survivors may use “cutting” in sensitive outreach.

Are all procedures the same?

No. Public-health classifications describe different forms and degrees of injury. All non-medically indicated forms involving children raise serious consent, health and human-rights concerns.

Is the procedure medically beneficial?

Recognized health authorities state that it has no health benefits and can cause immediate and long-term complications.

Are the laws described in older website pages current?

Not necessarily. They preserve reports from particular dates. Consult an official government or qualified legal source for current law.

Where can I report an error or outdated statement?

Use the contact page or email info@religioustolerance.en-html.org with the page title and the material that needs review.