Independent educational reading about belief, conscience and coexistence
Religious Tolerance
Religion in public life

How American adults identify religiously.

This archived guide examines changing religious identification in the United States, explains what survey categories measure, and places reported shifts in their historical context.

A diverse group of adults talking together outdoors
Research overview

Religious identification is not a single measure.

People may describe themselves through a denomination, a broad religious tradition, a personal spiritual outlook, or no religion. Surveys can therefore produce different results depending on the wording of the question, the available categories and whether respondents are asked about affiliation, belief, practice or upbringing.

Reading noteThis page preserves the subject of an older report while presenting its findings cautiously. Historical percentages should be read as survey results from their stated periods, not as a timeless description of every adult in the country.

What the earlier figures suggested

Reports from the late twentieth century described Christian identification as highly prevalent among U.S. adults. Later surveys recorded a lower Christian share and a larger proportion of adults identifying as religiously unaffiliated. These changes were gradual and varied by age, region, education, family background and the way a survey defined its categories.

Late 20th centuryChristian identification was widely reported in national surveys.
2007Later reporting showed a smaller Christian share than earlier estimates.
2014Survey results continued to document a more religiously diverse population.

Why the trend matters

A change in affiliation does not necessarily mean that every person has abandoned prayer, moral commitments or a sense of spiritual identity. Some people move between denominations, some retain a cultural connection without formal membership, and others adopt a secular or non-theistic worldview. Careful interpretation keeps these experiences distinct.

Questions for interpreting surveys

  • Which population was surveyed, and when?
  • Was the question about current affiliation, childhood upbringing, belief or practice?
  • Were respondents permitted to select more than one identity?
  • How were small traditions and unaffiliated respondents grouped?

For related reading, see the earlier poll material, discussion of religious data and demographic groups, and the guide to religiousness and public confidence.

A careful reading method

How to use this archive

Population-level results describe patterns, not the worth or sincerity of individual beliefs.

Check the date

Place every percentage in the period when the survey was conducted.

Read the wording

Small differences in questions can change how people classify themselves.

Separate identity

Affiliation, belief, practice and cultural background are related but not identical.

Allow variation

National patterns can conceal substantial differences among communities and generations.

Reader guide

Frequently asked questions

Does religious identification mean active participation?

No. A survey respondent may identify with a tradition without attending services regularly, while another person may practice privately without formal affiliation.

Why do reputable surveys report different percentages?

They may use different dates, samples, question wording, response options and methods for classifying people who select no religion or more than one identity.

What does “religiously unaffiliated” mean?

It generally describes respondents who select no religion, atheist, agnostic or another non-affiliated response. It does not by itself describe every belief or level of spirituality.

Are the historical figures current?

No. The figures discussed here belong to the periods named in the archive. Consult newer survey publications when making a current comparison.

Where can I compare traditions?

Use the compare beliefs section for broader introductions to religious and non-theistic worldviews.